It seems to me that if the best of modern science is not able to create a viable lifeform (a being that can live, grow, and reproduce) from a handful of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen atoms (the components of all organic compounds) that we can draw two complementary conclusions:

1) evolution as creating life from those elements by chance, no matter how much time is allotted, simply is not a realistic option.

2) intelligent design is the only option, and the designer must be mo…re intelligent and better equipped than the best that humanity has to offer.

Since evolutionists promote their worldview as scientific fact, I simply ask for one bit of scientific evidence (not theory or computer simulations) that proves me wrong. Just one.

And, I will stipulate micro evolution that is actually variation, such as the constant adaptation of virus that makes them difficult to control. But even here, with the ongoing adaptation, a virus is still a virus.

Just one verifiable species to species change that is macro evolution. The kind that makes monkeys out of rational men