Reflections Upon Reaching My 75th Birthday

Reflections on My 75th​​ Birthday

Bob Beanblossom

18 August 2022

 

I’m getting older.​​ To be honest,​​ I​​ am​​ old.​​ After all, I passed the biblical three score and 10-year mark five years ago​​ (Psalm 90:10).​​ This​​ birthday​​ marks my official​​ post-womb​​ passage​​ across​​ the ¾-century mark.​​ I have other milestones: graduation, marriage, the birth of my children.​​ My initial crossing of the Equator was at 0 degrees latitude and longitude, and I’ve crossed the International Date line several times. This is different. This passage has real consequences.​​ The Psalmist, too,​​ reflected: “I have been young, and now I am old; yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread” (Psalm 37:25).​​ I have to agree with him​​ on both counts.

 

One of the signs of my age is that memories of the Good Old Days are​​ often​​ more vivid than the​​ Here and​​ Now. Another is that I seem to have more doctors than friends. Like winning the lottery, good insurance attracts those who are concerned about by​​ well-paying​​ well-being.​​ 

 

Memories of the Good Old Days​​ are​​ sketchy​​ and imprecise​​ if not long gone,​​ but​​ my lifestyle​​ reflects the passage of time clearly.​​ I don’t get up as early​​ or​​ stay up as long​​ as I once did.​​ I work less, and​​ rest more.​​ My sight is dim,​​ my hearing dull.​​ My sense of smell left​​ me​​ about the same time​​ that​​ my hair did.​​ My cane is not essential,​​ but is a great comfort: it too is old and gnarly, but serviceable.​​ My head is as hard as ever but,​​ unencumbered by useless hair,​​ displays my battle scars​​ vividly.​​ 

 

I have had experiences that younger generations can’t comprehend. The words and phrases remain, but their original meanings, founded in function, have long since passed on. For instance, I have dialed a telephone, shared our party line,​​ made dime phone calls from a pay phone,​​ and used the services of an Operator to place long distance calls: all with phones “hard-wired” to the wall. “Portable” was an extra-long cord. I paid 23 cents a gallon for gasoline so that I could drive my stick shift car​​ that “cranked”​​ with a floor-mounted starter switch, enjoying “air-conditioning” adjusted by manually rolling the windows up and down as I listened to the AM radio, all​​ while​​ sitting close to my date on the bench seat. Later, I thought bucket seats were cool until I​​ realized​​ that the​​ separation of occupants was a hinderance to​​ romance. I watched cowboys and Indians and “The Wonderful World of Disney” on our 12-inch black and white TV, but​​ (this is personal, not generational)​​ never watched a​​ World Series or​​ Super Bowl game. I remember all three network TV stations​​ concluding their broadcast day​​ every night while playing the National Anthem and displaying a billowing Old Glory. Patriotism in those days was a virtue.​​ I pledged allegiance to America and prayed to almighty God as part of​​ opening activities in elementary school. Mrs. Ben, a volunteer,​​ was welcomed​​ into our classes weekly to give us Bible lessons.

 

I’ve been​​ ignored​​ by many​​ and abused by a few: no big deal.​​ It all works out.​​ It’s​​ usually not personal, for this world is not about me.​​ Paul said​​ it well: “And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are called according to His purpose” (Romans 8:28).​​ I am an unworthy benefactor of God’s grace, receiving​​ abundantly​​ what He considers good for me, not what I want. That, in itself, has been a blessing.

 

I am a person person, not a people person.​​ The individual is real, someone with whom I can interact—the crowd is not.​​ I’ve never been part of the​​ “In” crowd. I grew up in semi-isolation as​​ an only child on a farm. I’ve lived semi-isolated and will​​ die​​ in that mode. Those roots are deep and,​​ for me, comfortable.

 

I am a member of the Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club.​​ I spent most of my​​ naval​​ duty​​ in the waters offshore or the air above,​​ but​​ I​​ have stood on the soil of Vietnam:​​ eaten there, slept there, been a random target there—again,​​ nothing personal, just a pawn in a game played by​​ elite power structures.​​ I have seen death in all three.​​ I survived. Many did not. The relentless “Why” has made survival​​ uncomfortable​​ at times. My wife does not understand the nightmares. Maybe she won’t read this.​​ She​​ is a Vietnam vet, too, though in a different sense. She​​ went through​​ our​​ first pregnancy without me;​​ our first son was 13 days old before I knew he had been born. He​​ was​​ three​​ months old before I met​​ him,​​ coming off a 747 carried by his proud mama.​​ I was fortunate:​​ too many vets​​ down through the years​​ never met their children.​​ Instead, they got Taps​​ while​​ their families got a​​ meticulously​​ folded flag.​​ 

 

The joy of my life is my family, though experienced​​ rather vicariously these days:​​ Our children are grown and busy with their own families.​​ My wife continues to stick with me after 53 years, to her credit and my amazement.

 

The great blessing of my life is that, without any doubt or merit on my part, I know Jesus as my personal Savior. Because of that, I proclaim a message that the world​​ fervently​​ and aggressively rejects: All​​ of us​​ have sinned,​​ falling​​ short of God’s standards, but Jesus​​ provides the correction for each person who accepts His saving grace​​ (Romans 3:23). This is clearly revealed​​ in God’s inspired, inerrant, complete Word,​​ the Bible​​ (John​​ 1:12;​​ 3:16-17).​​ My voice—His message—has been marginalized, cut off, and shut down, but never silenced.​​ The latter, of course, is the Lords’ doing, not mine. I’m expendable, but He is invincible​​ (Mark 10:27).​​ I’ve always tried to be competent and content as I serve others, but found that this​​ often brought on confusion and distrust. I’ve encouraged folks to think for themselves using empirical evidence and logic rather than feelings. For that, many call me subversive.​​ 

 

But all in all, I’m still a voice to be heard, and​​ a​​ force to be reckoned with:​​ 

 

Ever so gently.

 ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​​​  

ABORTION After Roe vs. Wade

ABORTION After Roe vs. Wade​​ 

Personal Liberty vs. Personal Responsibility

 

By Bob Beanblossom

4 August 2022

 

 

The Supreme Court revisited abortion as a federally guaranteed right in Dobbs vs. Jackson and, on 28 June 2022, announced that the question of abortion must be settled as a state’s rights issue: the “right” is simply not found in the U.S. Constitution as the Court had declared in Roe. ​​ The decision is simple based on Constitutional law, but complex both in social implications and in​​ the sorting out what will be an ongoing panoply of statehouse debate and lawmaking over the next several years. Anticipating the various state solutions, President Biden has donned his lawmaking hat and issued an executive order that the Fed will pay for travel for any mother who intends to abort her baby from a non-abortion state to an abortion state. Since the President does not have the constitutional authority to enact legislation or appropriate funds, this should also be interesting.​​ 

 

 

Abortion​​ rights were​​ not settled by the recent Supreme Court ruling that overturned Roe as some folks thought.​​ In fact, the question of abortion as a legal means to terminate the life of an unborn American citizen was not considered. The decision​​ simply returned consideration of the legal question to the States where it belonged on Constitutional grounds. This has nothing to do with the moral question that should dominate the discussion but does not. Moral values, simply stated, should outweigh acts of physical pleasure by actions designed to produce human children. The ability to engage in an act that produces children does not suggest a right to destroy the children produced by those indiscriminate acts. Responsibility should come into play here.

 

 

The words and phrases used to describe abortion are always interesting. "Abortion rights," "the right to decide what happens to the (mother's) body," "mother's right to choose," etc. The author of a recent AOL article cited "reproductive rights."​​ 

Increasingly, these words and phrases are acknowledging the obvious: abortion is the killing of an unborn baby, the product of (statistically) a willful and intentional act by the mother and father that is known and physiologically intended to produce a human offspring. There is no other outcome than a human baby, no matter what words or phrases are used to obscure that fact.

 

 

This makes abortion a bit different from an appendectomy. The courts acknowledge this when an expectant mother is murdered by charging the killer with an additional count of homicide when the unborn baby is also killed. This dichotomy is not rational: either it is a living human baby, or it isn't. Holding that the baby in the womb is incapable of sustaining itself as grounds for in-womb murder is incredulous--neither can that same baby sustain itself for the first few years of its life, but this is not grounds for killing it.

 

 

Where was this same outcry by abortion-rights advocates when the government mandated COVID shots--what became of the right to choose? Yet another inconsistency. And, since it takes a male (a real one) and a female (a real one) to produce a human offspring by natural means in the womb, what about the rights of the father--the unborn child carries his DNA, too? So many contradictions.​​ 

Well, the court did good this time.​​ As President Biden’s job is not to legislate or appropriate funds, the Court’s job is not to decide issues based on popular opinion.​​ The​​ "right"​​ for a mother to kill her unborn child rather than carry it to term, give birth, and raise and nurture that product of her recreational activity​​ is not found in the US Constitution and should be considered with any subsequent legislation enacted on the state level. As for the moral discussion--that does not seem to interest the pleasure at any expense crowd.​​ But then, neither does the Constitutional basis of Supreme Court decisions.​​ 

 

​​ 

The Self-Identity Crisis

By Bob Beanblossom

10 May 2022

Isn’t it interesting that the highest form of self-actualization and self-identity for what appears to be a growing segment of our society is their sexual orientation? Not personal achievement, not family values, not even level of education, but how and whom they choose to engage in sexual activities with.

On 21 January 1961, in his inaugural speech as President, John F. Kennedy famously (maybe not to today’s folks) motivated the country with his question: “Ask not what your country can do for you–ask what you can do for your country . . . let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God’s work must truly be our own.”

Today, America’s claim pride lies not in the classroom, the board room, or the halls of business, industry, and government, but in the bedroom; not what we have achieved and will achieve, but with whom we engage in sexual activities, all in the name of personal freedom of expression. We as a society seek only what we can get, not what we can give. We no longer love this land but find reasons to condemn it in spite of the many blessings of liberty that allow the very protests against it.

This, it seems to me, does not portend well for the longevity of our society. History is full of the records of societies that no longer exist because they traded moral values and production for personal pleasure and greed. The crisis of American self-identity can only be solved when individuals start looking beyond what feels good to that which accomplished good for their families and society as a whole–which, just coincidently, corresponds with what is best for self.